Bloomberg reports that a fourth grader in Washington State was suspended after refusing to answer a question on a standardized test. Read the article to find out more about the child's respectful reason for refusing to answer the question.
After refusing to answer, the child was humiliated by the school principal, who said to him, "Good job, bud, you've ruined it for everyone in the school, the teachers and the school," and later described his behavior to his parents as "blatant defiance and insubordination." The principal was claiming that the child was bringing down the school's average test score, which was apparently unfounded because state regulations show that the test is pass/fail and there is no averaging of writing scores. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) uses test scores to measure a school's annual progress, and if schools fail to show progress, the principal can be fired.
This is what NCLB is doing to children in American schools. It's asinine to think that you can improve learning on a massive level by testing performance. What this act has done is rally principals around kids to make them test well, not to help them learn. And America's children get stuck with self-serving educators who need to care more about what they can do to save their jobs than to teach or allow kids to learn for the gratification that comes with becoming more knowledgeable and skillfull in the world.
Politicians need to stay the hell out of the education system. As with any kind of learning, you can't rush or force it for the sake of the outcome. Performing for rewards can be the root of many other problems, especially in this country. We so often perform for rewards of different kinds. Wage earners might perform for bonus money and raises. Kids might perform for stars or for grades. I fear that eventually, what might get lost in the picture is the personal rewards that come with accomplishment. To me, there's no greater reward than feeling good about what I'm doing or accomplishing -- feeling skilled and competent. Learning how to think for one's self, and understanding how to solve problems is all about the process, and not so much about the results.
I think NCLB has got it all wrong. I'm sure the outcome will be, unfortunately that we produce an ample supply of students that know how to answer test questions adequately, and much fewer that understand what to do with the all that information handed to them in years of learning how take tests.
Comments
12/06/06 @ 14:20
Unbelievable. I can't believe that a child would be suspended for five days over something like that. Stories like this make me wonder who our education system is for -- in cases like this, surely it can't be the kids.
05/23/07 @ 03:33
It's a thin line between making the educators accountable for teaching --- and then firing them when a single student decides not to take a test.
Although the example seems a bit extreme for a principal to publicly humiliate the child -- he has probably done this because it affects him directly.
Not saying its the child fault either, just seems to be unfortunate all round.
Brad
Aspergers Syndrome Help
11/25/07 @ 16:10
I work scoring student responses for state sponsored standardized tests. Appalled by the low quality of a vast majority of the responses, I began to discuss with the person next to me how teachers should be payed more. But then it dawned on me that, because of No Child Left Behind, the money that could be used to provide better education/educators is instead being used to contract out private corporations to test and measure the students. Those corporations then contract out to temporary agencies, which provide the employees who actually score the responses.
NCLB is just a clever way for Bush to funnel money from the government into the hands of private corporations, all the while fooling people into believing that he is actually helping children, the educational system and society as a whole. If the goal was to improve our educational system...it seems that the logical solution would be to directly invest money and effort into providing better education for our students. Instead, the conventional wisdom of the Bush administration has been that the best way to improve education is to pay corporations billions of dollars to confirm how stupid everyone is.
Has anyone benefitted from NCLB? Obviously not the students; their curriculum is being strictly narrowed to cover what could be on the test. Have educators/administrators benefitted? Rather than focusing their energy and efforts into helping students achieve their goals and become intelligent, successful members of society, they must constantly worry about preparing their students for these arbitrary standardized tests. The fear that low students' scores could cause you to lose your job can be quite consuming, and a diversion from the true task at hand. At the expense of every taxpaying citizen in this country, the only people who have consistently benefitted from NCLB are the corporations that are contracted to perform the testing.
Post new comment